The Advantages of the Alternative Vote System – An Overview

On 5th of May a referendum will be held to ask you, the voter, for the first time ever, how you want to elect your main public servants, Members of Parliament.  You will be offered a choice of voting Yes to the Alternative Vote, or voting No to retain the current First Past the Post System.

I urge you to vote Yes.  Why?  Well here is a brief guide to the advantages of the Alternative Vote. 

There are three big advantages that the Alternative Vote System has over the First Past.

It ends wasted votes.

It makes MP’s work harder, for you.

It ends jobs for life for MP’s.

Wasted Votes

A wasted vote is a vote that does not influence the outcome of the election.  A wasted vote is a vote where the voter might as well have stayed at home. I don’t mean that everyone should be able to vote for the winner but every vote should actively determine who that winner is.

At the moment many votes are cast for candidates who don’t finish in the top two or three. They have no effect on the result.

This has three bad outcomes.

Vote Splitting.  Under First Past the Post the votes for two similar candidates can be split.  Say Labour and the Co-op Party or the Conservative Party and UKIP.  Voters, unsure which will win, vote in equal numbers for both candidates. The total votes cast for similar candidates far outweigh the votes cast for their main rival, but the rival sneaks through the middle of the split votes and takes the seat with the largest minority of the vote.

Extremism.  Wasted votes allow highly potent minority groups to win seats in Parliament in the same way.  In a divided constituency a small, well organised, extremist party can easily emerge as the largest minority. When I say the largest minority the size can be very small. Norwich South is held on 29.35% of the votes cast. That’s right, you can win a seat on less than 1/3 of the votes cast and so can the BNP.

Disenfranchisement.  If your vote is wasted why would you bother voting?  Many people don’t. More and more every election. This leads to political apathy. The big issues aren’t properly considered. Voters and politicians start to ignore each other.

With vote splitting and disenfranchisement more and more MP can get away with ignoring most of the people in their constituency.

The alternative vote lets you rank candidates in order you would prefer them to be your MP. It removes the risk of vote splitting.

Under the Alternative Vote every MP needs to get 50% of the votes in the final round of counting. Most, 2/3, will need second preferences to get there. Using a preference system you can send a clear message to the returning office. “I want her, or her. I’ll tolerate him. I don’t want them.”

At the moment 2/3 of seats are held by an MP with the largest minority of votes. Only about 100 seats change hand each election. This means literally millions of people might as well have stayed in bed on polling day. The Alternative Vote will mean that many more seats are marginals and that every vote could play a part in deciding who has the sacred duty of representing them in Parliament.

Harder Working MP, For YOU

Most seats are not marginal seats. As a candidate, once you’ve been selected by Party HQ to win a safe seat you don’t have to do anything further to become and stay an MP.  You only need to do one thing to keep your job, your salary, the deferential treatment and fat expenses and the right to lecture the rest of the us. You need to keep your Party bosses happy.

I’m sure every MP will tell you they work 80 hour weeks. I’m sure many of them right. Are they working hard for you? Are they campaigning on the issues you want them to campaign on or are they smoozing with the Union bosses or Big Money Big City bankers who bankroll their Parties?

Only about 100 seats every change hands so most of the campaigning and most political interest goes to those seats.  If you’re not lucky enough to live in a marginal seat your voter power is hugely reduced. Not only can political parties ignore you but so can your MP too. He’s got this seat for life, he wants a ministerial car and you can’t give that to him.

When your MP can take his seat and your vote for granted does he really work for you?

The Alternative Vote requires MP’s to have the support of the majority (not just the largest minority) of the voters. That means that many more seats are marginal and that no seat can be relied on.  If an MP is not doing a good enough job but you support his party YOU can stand against him without worrying that you will split the vote and let in someone you don’t agree with.

Jobs for Life

Think about how hard it was to de-elect Neil Hamilton.  Every other candidate had to stand down and a famous and highly respected war corresondent had to run against him.

Think about how many MP’s who were implicated in the expenses scandal returned to Parliament.

How many MP’s who voted for the Iraq war were re-elected?

2/3rd of seats are held by an MP with less than 50% of the vote, most of these seats won’t every change hands. Once you’re in, even with a minority of support, you are there for life.

Having a job for life breeds complacency and contempt.  You don’t have to do a good job. You don’t have to answer to anyone.  You can vote how you like, without regard to any promise you might have made or any interests in your constituency.  Everyone else in the country faces the fear of losing their job. Shouldn’t MP’s feel that fear too?

The Alternative Vote system requires an MP to have the support of more than half his constituents.  Unless she is doing a good job, behaving ethically and honouring her pledges in the House she can’t expect to gather enough second preference to hold her seat.

You can read more about each of these advantages of the Alternative Vote by following the links in the text above.

If you’ve been persuaded to Vote Yes please  join our campaign nationally or in Edinburgh.


About fairervotesedinburgh

The unofficial blog for the Yes to Fairer Votes Campaign in Edinburgh. All views expressed are our own and do not necessisarily represent the views of the official Yes to Fairer Votes organisation
This entry was posted in Advantages of the Alternative Vote, Arguments for and Against, BNP, Conservative Party, Edinburgh, For and Against, Preferential Voting, Referendum Bill, Small Parties, Split Votes, UKIP, X Voting, Yes to AV. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The Advantages of the Alternative Vote System – An Overview

  1. Pingback: The Advantages of the Alternative Vote – Making MP’s Work Harder, for YOU | fairervotesedinburgh

  2. Pingback: The Advantages of the Alternative Vote – No More Wasted Votes, No More Split Votes | fairervotesedinburgh

  3. Pingback: The Advantages of the Alternative Vote – No More Wasted Votes, Fewer Disenfranchised Voters | fairervotesedinburgh

  4. Great blog, & a good article laying out the real advantages of the Alternative Vote- for electing a single MP at local constituency level (which is all we do at general elections!) it is a far fairer system than First Past the Post.

    I think the pro-FPTP arguments that it’s a good system for “kicking the rascals out” is an increasingly weak argument, especially when you realise that the national version of this is the replacing of one majority government with another majority one, which only happened once during the 20th century under FPTP (1970), as even the Labour landslide of 1997 was a Labour majority taking over from what had become a Conservative minority government (even then, the actual change in overall votes for the 2 parties really did not reflect the huge swing in terms of seats).

    I also think vote-splitting has become even more of a problem as the evidence I see across the midlands area of England is that most people no longer have any strong allegiance to the major political parties, which makes their voting choice more difficult when some of the more appealing candidates seem to share a lot of the same values. In this sense, the pro-FPTP & anti-AV argument that AV will promote centrist, “wishy-washy” politics is a complete non-starter because the main parties are already pitching themselves to this centre ground because that’s where the large majority of people are politically, & it is the parties themselves through their central controls & heavily stage-managed approach that are pushing this highly moulded, uncontroversial style of politics. Opponents of AV also then contradict this argument against it by trolling out the line that under AV candidates will have to pander to the “lunatic fringes” for preference votes, when really all candidates need to do is appreciate & open dialogue with moderate voters who usually don’t fully agree with all of their policies but may see merits in some of them. AV empowers all voters, but it also empowers the view that all mainstream parties have some policies of real merit & allows voters to give preferences accordingly.

    If you want to know more about how the Fairer Votes campaign is going & what we think about the various issues to do with AV & FPTP the please visit our blog here-

  5. Mogz says:

    Cautionary note on Neil Hamilton. Whatever you think of his politics, it was important that he was innocent until proved guilty. His wife was totally right to accuse Martin Bell’s candidacy of not complying with that principle. The parties who stood down to let Bell in were both being populist at the expense of an important civil liberty. Hold it aginst FPTP that if you lived in the Hamilton v Bell seat and you wanted neither to endorse what Bell was doing nor to vote for the Tory government we were all desperate to end, you were stuck and excluded from the election.

    Why nobody cared, has to do with the mentality produced by FPTO and safe seats – we have got used to accepting that folks in some seats are just unlucky with what they get. AV will largely end this, end the pressure of electoral calculation that can make it happen. But to end it totally we also need a rule to force every party or pact that is compting for governemnt – contesting a majority of seats – to contest every seat. This is a serious and obvious human right principle. 2 other injustices to voters which it will end, are: the tradition of not contesting the Speaker’s seat, and the parties of government not standing in Northern Ireland.

    • Thanks for you comment.

      Being innocent until proven guilty is a vital principle of the rule of law and civil liberties more generally. I would say that voters when selecting their MP have the right to say “He may not be proven guilty but he looks dodgy and I don’t want him”

      You’re absolutely right on the point first past the post requiring a false dichotomy between Hamilton and Bell and, although I personally would always like to see more Independent Members of Parliament, I do think it wrong that voters in Tatton were denied the opportunity to vote for Labour or Liberal Democrat candidates. As you say, that’s a problem with First Past the Post and neatly illustrates the advantages of the alternative vote over first post the post.

  6. Imogen Caterer says:

    Great article on alternative vote advantages. we must campaign hard for the end of the dreadful first-past-the-system which only gives the allusion of fairness. Mps should be backed by 50% of the vote of their constituents.

  7. Pingback: Review 1 – Alternative Vote Referendum « alternativevotereview

  8. I’m pleased to say that the this article has been included in the first edition of the Alternative Vote Review.

    If you have any more articles on the Alternative Vote Referendum that you’d like us to include in future reviews please nominate them.

  9. Pingback: What? No Apple Pie? The Alternative Vote Refernendum Ballot in Full | fairervotesedinburgh

  10. Pingback: Edinburgh Says Yes on the Beach – Guest Post by Kate | fairervotesedinburgh

  11. Pingback: How do I pick the best Yes to the Alternative Vote Video | fairervotesedinburgh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s